On April 23, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order entitled “Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy,” directing federal agencies to effectively end the use of “disparate impact” liability in enforcing anti-discrimination laws. This order marks a significant shift in how employers must assess their employment policies and practices, as well as how those policies and practices impact employees.
What is Disparate Impact Liability? Disparate impact liability is a long-standing legal theory under federal anti-discrimination law, most notably codified in Title VII. Unlike disparate treatment, which involves intentional or clear discrimination, disparate impact focuses on otherwise neutral employment practices that disproportionately affect members of a protected class.
Under this theory, an employer may be liable for discrimination if a policy or employment practice causes a significant difference in outcomes or adverse effects on a protected group and is not shown to be job-related and consistent with a business necessity, even if there is no facially discriminatory policy, practice, or intent. This theory has been upheld in several landmark court cases, but now faces scrutiny from the Trump Administration.
Impact of the Executive Order: President Trump’s Executive Order asserts that the application of disparate impact liability is inconsistent with the principle of equal protection under the law and is, therefore, unconstitutional. Thus, the Executive Order instructs federal agencies to “deprioritize enforcement of all statutes and regulations to the extent they include disparate-impact liability.” This instruction will effectively halt federal investigations, lawsuits, and regulatory actions that involve or rely upon this theory of discrimination.
The Order further directs the Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Attorney General to review all pending investigations, civil suits, and enforcement actions that involve the disparate-impact theory and to issue joint guidance for employers regarding the appropriate methods to promote equal access to employment opportunities. Ultimately, this Executive Order posits the Trump Administration’s position that disparate impact theory promotes discriminatory practices and undermines meritocracy in hiring and advancement. Indeed, the Executive Order specifically provides that disparate impact liability “imperils the effectiveness of civil rights laws by mandating, rather than proscribing, discrimination” and “threatens the commitment to merit and equality of opportunity that forms the foundation of the American Dream.”
Key Takeaways for Employers: Although President Trump’s Executive Orders and policies have faced legal challenges, this Executive Order is likely to stall pending claims involving disparate impact liability. The Executive Order is also likely to reduce the number of new claims raised by employees based on the disparate impact theory – at least for now. The KMK Labor and Employment team will continue to monitor forthcoming guidance from the EEOC and Department of Justice and is available to advise employers on their employment practices.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2025 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Alison practices in the firm’s Labor & Employment Group, where she assists clients in all stages of workplace disputes. Alison has extensive experience counseling clients regarding hiring and firing issues, disciplinary ...
- Associate
Kelzé Riley is an associate in the firm's Labor & Employment Group. Her practice includes a wide range of labor and employment matters.
Kelzé earned her J.D. from the University of Cincinnati College of Law in 2024. While in law ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Employment Law
- Labor & Employment Law
- Discrimination
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- EEOC
- Labor Law
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Department of Labor
- Supreme Court
- Title VII
- NLRB
- Compliance
- Coronavirus
- Workplace Violence
- FLSA
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Department of Justice
- Religion Discrimination
- Reasonable Accommodation
- NLRA
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Diversity
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Federal Trade Commission
- Overtime Pay
- Artificial Intelligence
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Arbitration
- FMLA
- Workplace Accommodations
- Employment Litigation
- Litigation
- IRS
- Medical Marijuana
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Unions
- Whistleblower
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- United States Supreme Court
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
Recent Posts
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- Revisiting ADA Compliance: Lessons from a Recent Court Decision
- Federal Court Strikes Down Part of EEOC Rule Requiring Accommodations for Elective Abortion Under the PWFA
- More on Equal Opportunity: Executive Order Seeks to End Disparate Impact Liability to promote Equal Opportunity
- PIP This: The Expansion of Actionable Adverse Employment Decisions in the Wake of Muldrow v. City of St. Louis
- The Independent Contractor Tug-of-War: Navigating the Latest DOL Shifts
- ICE Raids and Audits – What’s an Employer to Do
- New Online Registration Requirements for Foreign Nationals
- Workplace Violence: Are You Taking Required Steps to Protect Your Employees?
- EEOC & DOJ New Guidance on DEI-Related Discrimination: What Does it Mean for Employers?